Verticillium dahliae · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. metabolitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. volatile organic compoundResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Delta baryonResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Hordeum vulgareResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. loss of functionPositive and negative results93 papers: 34 positive, 59 negative or no effect
8. transgenicPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
9. inoculationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. overexpressionPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
12. classPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. pathogen productResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. pruningResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.