Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. Vigna unguiculataPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. imidaclopridResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. carbendazimResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. sulfoxaflorResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. SpinetoramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. acetamipridResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. flonicamidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. buprofezinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. diafenthiuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. dinotefuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. nitenpyramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. profenofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. botanicalPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. ipmResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.