Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. flonicamidPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. dimethoatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. buprofezinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. imidaclopridResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. acephateResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. aldicarbResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. fipronilResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. SpinetoramResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. thiamethoxamResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. carbendazimResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. sulfoxaflorResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. thiodicarbResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. abamectinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. azoxystrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. carbarylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. clothianidinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. diafenthiuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. phorateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. profenofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. tolfenpyradResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. insecticidePositive and negative results25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect
23. seed treatmentPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
26. tillagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. ipmResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
34. densityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
35. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.