Meloidogyne incognita · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. aldicarbPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. abamectinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. fluopyramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Arachis hypogaeaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Bacillus velezensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. insecticidePositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
9. inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. rotationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. solarizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. lightResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. overexpressionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.