Anthonomus grandis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. malathionPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. maleate(2-)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. diflubenzuronResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. azinphos-methylResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. parathion-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. toxapheneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. aldicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. carbarylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. insecticidePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. sowing timePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. trap barrierResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.