Spodoptera littoralis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. gossypolPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. chlorpyrifosPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. emamectin benzoateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. SpinetoramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. lufenuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. novaluronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. profenofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. pyridalylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.