Cytology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. trifluralinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. etheneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. reactive oxygen speciesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. sodium nitroprussideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. loss of functionPositive and negative results8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect
8. classPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.