kaolin · Growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
9 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effect of Increasing Foliage Reflectance on Yield, Growth, and Physiological Behavior of a Dryland Cotton Crop1 (1979)
no changeReflectant sprays did not significantly affect stand height, leaf area index or dry weight.
Effects of Foliar Spray on Morpho-Physiological Parameters under High Temperature Stress in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (2021)increaseKaolin spray significantly increased cotton plant height in both temperature conditions.
What separates themTest system: field · controlled environmentCompare the two papers → - Effect of Increasing Foliage Reflectance on Yield, Growth, and Physiological Behavior of a Dryland Cotton Crop1 (1979)
no changeReflectant sprays did not significantly affect stand height, leaf area index or dry weight.
Effects of Foliar Spray on Morpho-Physiological Parameters under High Temperature Stress in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (2021)increaseKaolin spray increased plant height and leaf area in ambient and high temperature conditions.
What separates themTest system: field · controlled environmentSituation: not stated · heatCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 4
Response of Cotton Plant to Foliar Application with Mepiquat Chloride (Pix) and Kaolin · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Kaolin and Jasmonic acid improved cotton productivity under water stress conditions · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.