Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Production

Response of Cotton Plant to Foliar Application with Mepiquat Chloride (Pix) and Kaolin

A. El-Gabiery; Y. Ata Allah

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

One field experiment was carried out on clay soil in 2016 season and repeated in 2017 season in El-Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center, El-Gharbiya Governorate, Egypt, to study the effect of seven treatments including foliar application with two rates of mepiquat chloride (pix); 2 and 3cm3/L, two rates of Kaolin (2 and 3g/L), two rates of mepiquat chloride(pix) and Kaolin application in combination (2cm3+2g)/L, (3cm3+3g)/Lthree times (at squaring stage, at the start of flowering and at the top of flowering) and control treatment on leaf chemical composition, plant growth, earliness, fiber quality and yield of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.), Giza 86 cultivar. A randomized complete blocks design with 3 replicates was used in both seasons. The important results could be summarized as follow:- The tested treatments had a significant effect on leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents in the two seasons of study, where foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times recorded the highest values of these traits in both seasons followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride alone at 3cm3/L. While, the control treatment produced the lowest values of these traits.Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly reduced final plant height, followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L three times, foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 2cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 2g/L three times, foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 2cm3/L, foliar application with kaolin at 3g/L three times and foliar application with kaolin at 2g/L three times, while control treatment recorded the tallest plants. Number of fruiting branches/plant did not affect by these treatments. Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased numbers of total flowers and total bolls set/plant, boll setting and earliness percentages followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L. But, the lowest values were obtained from the control treatment.Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased boll weight, number of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed index and seed cotton yield/fed in the two seasons of study followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L. But, untreated plants produced the lowest values.On the other hand, the tested treatments had insignificant effect on fiber quality (fiber strength and micronaire reading) and lint percentage in both seasons.This study demonstrates that foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride (pix) at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times (at squaring stage, at the start of flowering and at the top of flowering) could be recommended to improve the chemical composition of leaves, vegetative growth traits, earliness, yield/feddan, yield components and fiber quality of Giza 86 cotton cultivar under conditions of El-Gemmeiza location.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high-rate spray gave the highest leaf N, P and K contents in both seasons.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
leaves N, P, Ke1
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times recorded the highest values of these traits in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high-rate spray gave the highest leaf chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in both seasons.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contentse1
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times recorded the highest values of these traits in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate mepiquat chloride alone ranked second for leaf chemical contents.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
foliar application with mepiquat chloride alone at 3cm3/Le0
Outcome
leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contentse1
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride alone at 3cm3/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1232 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–971 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the lowest leaf chemical contents.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contentse1
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“the control treatment produced the lowest values of these traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1305 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high-rate spray significantly reduced final plant height.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
final plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly reduced final plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruiting branch number was unaffected by the tested treatments.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
Number of fruiting branches/plante0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Number of fruiting branches/plant did not affect by these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high-rate spray increased total flowers and bolls set per plant.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
numbers of total flowers and total bolls set/plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased numbers of total flowers and total bolls set/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–2065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high-rate spray increased boll setting and earliness percentages.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
boll setting and earliness percentagese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased numbers of total flowers and total bolls set/plant, boll setting and earliness percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–2105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high-rate spray increased boll weight and open boll number.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
boll weight, number of open bolls/plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased boll weight, number of open bolls/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2235–2391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high-rate spray increased seed cotton yield per plant and per feddan and seed index.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
seed cotton yield/plant, seed index and seed cotton yield/fede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased boll weight, number of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed index and seed cotton yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2235–2454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly affect fiber strength, micronaire or lint percentage.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
tested treatmentse0
Outcome
fiber quality (fiber strength and micronaire reading) and lint percentagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“tested treatments had insignificant effect on fiber quality (fiber strength and micronaire reading) and lint percentage in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2620–2755 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend three high-rate combined sprays to improve cotton performance at El-Gemmeiza.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride (pix) at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three timese0
Outcome
improve the chemical composition of leaves, vegetative growth traits, earliness, yield/feddan, yield components and fiber qualitye0
Setting
El-Gemmeiza locatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride (pix) at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times (at squaring stage, at the start of flowering and at the top of flowering) could be recommended to improve the chemical composition of leaves, vegetative growth traits, earliness, yield/feddan, yield components and fiber quality of Giza 86 cotton cultivar under conditions of El-Gemmeiza location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2785–3180 · show in text ↑

kaolin · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mepiquat chloride · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chloride · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chloride · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

mepiquat chloride · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

8 of 17 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.