Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plants treated with mepiquat chloride produced 3.1% fewer fruiting positions than control plants (P = 0.07).

A claim from Cotton Fruiting Modification with Mepiquat Chloride1 · 1986

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with mepiquat chloride produced 3.1% fewer fruiting positions than control plants (P = 0.07).

Treatment
treated with MCe1
Outcome
fruiting positionse1
Direction
fewere1
Value
3.1%e1
Qualifier
P = 0.07e1
Comparator
control plantse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plants treated with MC produced 3.1% fewer (P = 0.07) fruiting positions than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1650
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6

Title

Cotton Fruiting Modification with Mepiquat Chloride1

T. A. Kerby; Kater Hake; Mark Keeley Agronomy Journal 1986. doi:10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800050032x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e54bc973638d8c0e61d09d959972a2544f36c2b25e682b92c6df52c18767527e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

chloride · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

mepiquat chloride · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.