Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

I Effect of Mepiquat chloride and boron on irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in Turkey

OZGUL GORMUS

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted from 2003 to 2004 to evaluate effects of foliar application of Mepiquat chloride and boron on growth and yield of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mepiquat chloride @ 0.15 litrelha sig- nificantly reduced plant height, number of main stem nodes and nodes to first fruiting branch compared to the control. Plants treated with Mepiquat chloride at first flowering and 2 weeks after first flower stage and boron 8 0.15 litrelha at first flowering and and 4 weeks after first flowering resulted in significantly highest number of open bolls and seed-cotton yield. All foliar B applications applied either at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first flower resulted in similar but higher yields than the control. Neither Mepiquat chloride nor B affected gin turnout. I Key words : Boll weight, Boron, Cotton, Plant height, Main stem nodes, Yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride significantly reduced cotton plant height.

Treatment
Mepiquat chloride @ 0.15 litrelhae0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mepiquat chloride @ 0.15 litrelha sig- nificantly reduced plant height, number of main stem nodes and nodes to first fruiting branch compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride significantly reduced number of main stem nodes.

Treatment
Mepiquat chloride @ 0.15 litrelhae0
Outcome
number of main stem nodese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mepiquat chloride @ 0.15 litrelha sig- nificantly reduced plant height, number of main stem nodes and nodes to first fruiting branch compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride significantly reduced nodes to first fruiting branch.

Treatment
Mepiquat chloride @ 0.15 litrelhae0
Outcome
nodes to first fruiting branche0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mepiquat chloride @ 0.15 litrelha sig- nificantly reduced plant height, number of main stem nodes and nodes to first fruiting branch compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Timed mepiquat chloride and boron treatment produced the highest open boll count.

Treatment
Mepiquat chloride at first flowering and 2 weeks after first flower stage and boron 8 0.15 litrelha at first flowering and and 4 weeks after first floweringe0
Outcome
number of open bollse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants treated with Mepiquat chloride at first flowering and 2 weeks after first flower stage and boron 8 0.15 litrelha at first flowering and and 4 weeks after first flowering resulted in significantly highest number of open bolls and seed-cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Timed mepiquat chloride and boron treatment produced the highest seed cotton yield.

Treatment
Mepiquat chloride at first flowering and 2 weeks after first flower stage and boron 8 0.15 litrelha at first flowering and and 4 weeks after first floweringe0
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants treated with Mepiquat chloride at first flowering and 2 weeks after first flower stage and boron 8 0.15 litrelha at first flowering and and 4 weeks after first flowering resulted in significantly highest number of open bolls and seed-cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar B applications yielded more than control.

Treatment
foliar B applicationse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“All foliar B applications applied either at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first flower resulted in similar but higher yields than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride did not affect gin turnout.

Treatment
Mepiquat chloridee0
Outcome
gin turnoute0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Neither Mepiquat chloride nor B affected gin turnout”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B did not affect gin turnout.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
gin turnoute0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Neither Mepiquat chloride nor B affected gin turnout”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–785 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

chloride · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

mepiquat chloride · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 67 positive, 11 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

stage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 38 positive, 25 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.