Quality: oil · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. chlormequat chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. mepiquat chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. nitrogenPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. densityPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
8. droughtPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
9. irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. loss of functionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. applicationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. sowing timePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. pruningPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. classResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.