Quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. zinc atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. chloridePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. mepiquat chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. sodium chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. boron atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. amino acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. diammonium hydrogen phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. applicationPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. fertilizationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. classPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. potassiumPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. salinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. nitrogenResults agree16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. heatResults agree6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect
20. phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. floodingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. humidityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.