Yield · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)

1. Manihot esculentaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. TrichodermaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. food additive carrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. shadeResults differ16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect · 10 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
8. fertilizationPositive and negative results42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect
9. pruningPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. intercroppingPositive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
11. pollinationPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. irrigationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. cultivation systemPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. inoculationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. otherPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. climate sitePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. nitrogenPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. phosphorusPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. infectionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. limePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. densityResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. graftingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. in vitroResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. droughtResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
28. fungicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. ipmResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. sanitationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.