Disease · Carica papaya (papaya)

1. Trichoderma harzianumPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. thiabendazolePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Pseudomonas fluorescensPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. chitosanResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. calcium atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. sodium hydrogencarbonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Bacillus amyloliquefaciensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. mancozebResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. nitric oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. prochlorazResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. botanicalPositive and negative results18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. inoculationPositive and negative results14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect
19. heatPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. insecticidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. applicationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. storageResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. processingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. micronutrientResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. uvResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.