Yield · Carica papaya (papaya)

1. boraxPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. zinc sulfatePositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. boron atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. AzotobacterResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. calcium nitrateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. mepiquat chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. poly(ethylene)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. fertilizationPositive and negative results46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect
16. in vitroPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. inoculationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. irrigationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. potassiumPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. intercroppingPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. pollinationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. processingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. applicationResults agree17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. mulchingResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. nitrogenResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. graftingResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. growing mediumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. mycorrhizaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. cultivation systemResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.