Disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)

44 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Fusarium oxysporumPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  2. azoxystrobinPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. calcium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  4. cyprodinilPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. difenoconazolePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. tebuconazolePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. thiophanate-methylPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  8. Bacillus velezensisPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. Rhizoctonia solaniPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  11. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Lagenaria sicerariaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. Vicia villosaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. Monosporascus cannonballusResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. Trichoderma lentiformeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. chlorothalonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. fludioxonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. mancozebResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. inoculationPositive and negative results36 papers: 10 positive, 26 negative or no effect
  24. graftingPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. applicationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. infectionPositive and negative results9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  27. fungicidePositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  28. biocontrolPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. mulchingPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  30. loss of functionPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  31. botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  32. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  33. cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  34. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  35. pathogen productPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  36. transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  37. seed treatmentResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. allelopathyResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. cover cropResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  43. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  44. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.