- Fusarium oxysporumPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- azoxystrobinPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- calcium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- cyprodinilPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- difenoconazolePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tebuconazolePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- thiophanate-methylPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Bacillus velezensisPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Rhizoctonia solaniPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Lagenaria sicerariaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Vicia villosaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Monosporascus cannonballusResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma lentiformeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorothalonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fludioxonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mancozebResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results36 papers: 10 positive, 26 negative or no effect
- graftingPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect
- fungicidePositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- biocontrolPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mulchingPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pathogen productPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- allelopathyResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cover cropResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.