Molecular: metabolites · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)

31 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. boron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. ethenePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. salicylhydroxamic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. diammonium hydrogen phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. forchlorfenuronResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  12. hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. graftingResults differ20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  15. fertilizationPositive and negative results16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  16. lightPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  19. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. pollinationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. botanicalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. harvest timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. mulchingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. salinityResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  26. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. ipmResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.