Nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)

1. calcium atomResults differ5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. p-chloromercuribenzenesulfonic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. fertilizationPositive and negative results21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect
5. graftingPositive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
6. nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. salinityResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
12. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.