Physiology: oxidative · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)

27 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. silicon atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. calcium(2+)Positive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. melatoninResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. calcium atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. salicylic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. gamma-aminobutyric acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. spermidineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  14. trehaloseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. salinityPositive and negative results9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  16. floodingPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  17. loss of functionPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  18. coldPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. droughtResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  21. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. resistance inducerResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. storageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.