Yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)

82 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. salicylic acidResults differ5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  2. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. forchlorfenuronPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  5. sodium chloridePositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  6. Oryza sativaPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. Zea maysPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  8. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. boron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. indole-3-acetic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  11. Cucumis metuliferusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. Vigna unguiculataPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. paclobutrazolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. silicon atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. N-benzyladenineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. Amaranthus caudatusResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. Manihot esculentaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. Phoenix dactyliferaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. Vicia villosaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. charcoalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. magnesium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. silver atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. vinyl groupResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. fertilizationResults differ95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect · 4 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  33. irrigationResults differ57 papers: 37 positive, 20 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  34. graftingResults differ34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 16 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  35. salinityResults differ22 papers: 1 positive, 21 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  36. droughtResults differ16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect · 12 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  37. organicResults differ4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  38. mulchingPositive and negative results44 papers: 37 positive, 7 negative or no effect
  39. nitrogenPositive and negative results28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  40. applicationPositive and negative results25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  41. transplantingPositive and negative results20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  42. inoculationPositive and negative results17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  43. densityPositive and negative results15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect
  44. pruningPositive and negative results15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  45. intercroppingPositive and negative results13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  46. otherPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  47. potassiumPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  48. cultivation systemPositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  49. botanicalPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  50. insecticidePositive and negative results8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.