Control · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)

1. azoxystrobinPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. silicon atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. pyraclostrobinPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. pectinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. TrichodermaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Bacillus subtilisResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Allium sativumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Ampelomyces quisqualisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Peronospora farinosaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. acetateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. avermectinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. chlorothalonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. dimethomorphResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. diniconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. dipotassium hydrogen phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. ethanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. kresoxim-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. spermidineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. botanicalPositive and negative results15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect
23. applicationPositive and negative results13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect
24. inoculationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. biocontrolPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
26. fertilizationPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
27. processingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. insecticidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. fungicideResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. in vitroResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.