Crop injury · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)

1. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. nitric oxidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. paclobutrazolPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. sodium chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. ascorbatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. dicambaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. ethanolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. salicylic acidResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. sodium nitroprussideResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. diuronResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14. 4-methoxybenzoic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. alpha-tocopherolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. atrazineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. benomylResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. halothaneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. methoxyfluraneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. methyl esterResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. sulfentrazoneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. coldResults differ8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
26. botanicalPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
27. storagePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. uvPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
30. fungicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
31. salinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. heavy metalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. heatResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. herbicideResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
36. co2Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
38. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.