Physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)

40 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. salicylic acidResults differ12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 15 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  2. chitosanResults differ5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  3. silicon atomResults differ5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  4. selenium atomResults differ2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  5. sodium chloridePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  6. Allium sativumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. uniconazolePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  8. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. melatoninResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. sodium nitroprussideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. glycine betaineResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. nitric oxideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. calcium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. calcium(2+)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. spermidineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. prolineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. spermineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. graftingResults differ15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  21. trap barrierResults differ4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  22. fertilizationPositive and negative results19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  23. inoculationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. nitrogenPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. salinityPositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  26. irrigationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. otherPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. mycorrhizaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. co2Results agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. lightResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. floodingResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  37. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.