- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- poly(ethylene glycol)Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mulchingPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- processingPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- graftingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- heatPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- organicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- shadePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lightResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.