Quality: postharvest · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)

1. ethenePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. chitosanPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. salicylic acidResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. putrescineResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Gibberellic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. calcium atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. melatoninResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. potassium permanganateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. Rhizopus stoloniferResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. Terminalia catappaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. sodium disulfiteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. storagePositive and negative results19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect
19. lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. co2Positive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. processingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. heatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. graftingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.