Quality: sugar starch · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)

1. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. etheneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. graftingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.