Yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Prunus spinosaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. calcium chloride dihydratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. paclobutrazolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. Terminalia catappaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. melatoninResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. boron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. forchlorfenuronResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. ammonium thiosulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. boric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. carbarylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationPositive and negative results18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect
16. fertilizationPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. graftingPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. pruningPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. nitrogenPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. droughtPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. shadePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. pollinationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.