Phenology · Arabidopsis

1. messenger RNAPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. coldResults differ12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
3. overexpressionPositive and negative results32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect
4. loss of functionPositive and negative results29 papers: 5 positive, 24 negative or no effect
5. lightPositive and negative results16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect
6. transgenicPositive and negative results13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect
7. stagePositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
8. classPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. uvPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. co2Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. heatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. magneticResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.