Tolerance: abiotic · Arabidopsis

1. jasmonic acidResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. 5-azacytidineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. 3-aminobutanoic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. cyclic nucleotideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. overexpressionPositive and negative results49 papers: 46 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. loss of functionPositive and negative results40 papers: 22 positive, 18 negative or no effect
8. transgenicPositive and negative results21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. salinityPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. seed treatmentPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. coldResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.