Phenology · Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress)

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. etheneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. co2Results differ4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
5. overexpressionPositive and negative results19 papers: 9 positive, 10 negative or no effect
6. loss of functionPositive and negative results15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect
7. coldPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. lightPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
9. transgenicPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
10. stagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. classPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. shadePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.