Yield · Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress)

1. indole-3-acetic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. naptalamPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. lysophosphatidic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. loss of functionPositive and negative results18 papers: 5 positive, 13 negative or no effect
8. overexpressionPositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
9. co2Positive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
10. lightPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
11. transgenicPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. coldPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. nitrogenPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
14. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. uvPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. pruningPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. competitionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.