Physiology: pigments · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)

1. lead atomResults differ4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. zinc atomPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
3. sulfur atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. sodium chloridePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
5. melatoninPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. cadmium atomResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
7. salicylic acidResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. chromium atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
10. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. heatPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14. salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
15. uvPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. heavy metalResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
19. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. resistance inducerResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.