Control · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)

29 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. glyphosatePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. paraquatPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. glufosinatePositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  4. EthalfluralinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. imidaclopridPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. benazolinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. carbendazimResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. SethoxydimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. adjuvantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. clethodimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. dicambaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. nonionic surfactantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. procymidoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. pydiflumetofenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. pymetrozineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. trifluralinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. applicationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. seed treatmentPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. herbicidePositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  23. fungicidePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. insecticidePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.