- copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- paclobutrazolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- multi-walled carbon nanotubeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tungstateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- shadeResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.