- Brassica napus var. napusPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- trifluralinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- benazolin-ethylResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- benazolinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- napropamideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- quizalofop-P-ethylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- clodinafop-propargylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cover cropPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- rotationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.