Control · Brassica rapa (field mustard)

1. fluazinamResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. chlorothalonilResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. cyazofamidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. irrigationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.