Brevicoryne brassicae · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)

1. Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Coccinella septempunctataResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. azadirachtinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. dimethoateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. thiamethoxamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Beauveria bassianaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Jatropha curcasResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Melia azedarachResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. endosulfanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. ethanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. imidaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. thiaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. botanicalResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. intercroppingResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. co2Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.