Control · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)

1. Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. aldrinPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. pentachloronitrobenzenePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. endrinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. phytogenic insecticidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. carbendazimResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. methomylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. tebufenozideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Nicotiana tabacumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. OxyfluorfenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. avermectinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. chlorfenapyrResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. chlorothalonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. dimercury dichlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. emamectinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. emamectin benzoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. hydrochlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. indoxacarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. pendimethalinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. riboflavinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. botanicalPositive and negative results15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect
27. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
28. insecticidePositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. ipmPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. transplantingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. fungicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.