- brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lightResults differ10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- nitrogenPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- storageResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- uvResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- heatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.