Physiology: oxidative · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)

25 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. cobalt atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. melatoninResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. salicylic acidResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. cadmium atomResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  5. selenium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. hydrogen sulfideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. nitric oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  12. storagePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. botanicalPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. droughtPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  15. radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  16. uvPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  18. fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. salinityResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  20. heavy metalResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  21. lightResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.