Weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)

1. OxyfluorfenPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. trifluralinPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. pendimethalinPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Zea mays subsp. maysPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. clomazonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. Brassica oleracea var. capitataResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. poly(ethylene)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Brassica oleracea var. italicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Crotalaria junceaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. FluchloralinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. SorghumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. clopyralidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. napropamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. propachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. propanilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. sulfentrazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. mulchingPositive and negative results18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect
18. cover cropPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. tillagePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. rotationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. herbicideResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. organicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. transplantingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.