glyphosate · Yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)
6 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Performance of certain herbicides under two sources of nitrogen fertilization on broomrape growth and cabbage crop. (2016)
increaseGlyphosate increased cabbage yield by 85.7% in the first season compared with the weedy check.
Strategies to terminate summer cover crops for weed management in no-tillage vegetable production in southeast Brazil (2021)no changeGlyphosate did not affect broccoli yield.
What separates themSituation: weed infestation · not statedCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.