Paper · 2021 · Weed Science

Strategies to terminate summer cover crops for weed management in no-tillage vegetable production in southeast Brazil

Roberto Botelho Ferraz Branco; Fernando de Carvalho; João Paulo Oliveira; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract Cover crop residue left on the soil surface as organic mulch in no-tillage crop production provides several environmental benefits, including weed suppression. Thus, many farmers who use cover crops attempt to reduce the use of agricultural inputs, especially herbicides. Therefore, our objectives were to study the potential of different cover crop species to suppress weeds and produce an in situ organic mulch and to evaluate the effect of the organic mulch with and without spraying glyphosate on weed suppression for vegetable (tomato [ Solanum lycopersicum L.] and broccoli [ Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis ]) growth and yield. Five cover crop treatments (sunn hemp [ Crotalaria juncea L.], jack bean [ Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.], pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], forage sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. bicolor ], and no cover crop [control]) were used in the main plots; and glyphosate was or was not sprayed on the flattened cover crop in the subplots of this split-plot experimental design. Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum, and sunn hemp resulted in lower weed biomass during the early seasons of both tomato and broccoli than mulch from jack bean and no cover crop (control). Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping reduced weed biomass by 103 g m −2 and 20 g m −2 by 45 and 60 d after transplanting (DATr) of tomato, respectively, and resulted in a better tomato yield compared with not spraying. Glyphosate reduced weed biomass by 110 g m −2 in the early season of broccoli (30 DATr) but did not affect yield. Terminating high-biomass cover crops with a roller-crimper is a promising technique for weed management in vegetable crops that has the potential to reduce or even eliminate the need for herbicide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum and sunn hemp gave lower weed biomass in the early season of tomato than mulch from jack bean or no cover crop.

Treatment
Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum, and sunn hempe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
during the early seasonse0
Comparator
mulch from jack bean and no cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum, and sunn hemp resulted in lower weed biomass during the early seasons of both tomato and broccoli than mulch from jack bean and no cover crop (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum and sunn hemp gave lower weed biomass in the early season of broccoli than mulch from jack bean or no cover crop.

Treatment
Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum, and sunn hempe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
during the early seasonse0
Comparator
mulch from jack bean and no cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic mulch from pearl millet, sorghum, and sunn hemp resulted in lower weed biomass during the early seasons of both tomato and broccoli than mulch from jack bean and no cover crop (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping reduced weed biomass by 103 g m -2 in tomato.

Treatment
Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimpinge1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
103 g m −2e1
Qualifier
after transplanting (DATr)e1
Comparator
not sprayinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping reduced weed biomass by 103 g m −2 and 20 g m −2 by 45 and 60 d after transplanting (DATr) of tomato, respectively, and resulted in a better tomato yield compared with not spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping reduced weed biomass by 20 g m -2 in tomato at 60 DATr.

Treatment
Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimpinge1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
20 g m −2e1
Qualifier
after transplanting (DATr)e1
Comparator
not sprayinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping reduced weed biomass by 103 g m −2 and 20 g m −2 by 45 and 60 d after transplanting (DATr) of tomato, respectively, and resulted in a better tomato yield compared with not spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping gave a better tomato yield than not spraying.

Treatment
Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimpinge1
Outcome
tomato yielde1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
not sprayinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying glyphosate after roller-crimping reduced weed biomass by 103 g m −2 and 20 g m −2 by 45 and 60 d after transplanting (DATr) of tomato, respectively, and resulted in a better tomato yield compared with not spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate reduced weed biomass by 110 g m -2 in the early season of broccoli.

Treatment
Glyphosatee2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed biomasse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
110 g m −2e2
Qualifier
30 DATre2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Glyphosate reduced weed biomass by 110 g m −2 in the early season of broccoli (30 DATr) but did not affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate did not affect broccoli yield.

Treatment
Glyphosatee2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Glyphosate reduced weed biomass by 110 g m −2 in the early season of broccoli (30 DATr) but did not affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1574 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Terminating high-biomass cover crops with a roller-crimper is a promising technique for weed management in vegetable crops that could reduce the need for herbicide.

Taxon
vegetable cropse3
Outcome
promising technique for weed managemente3

Verbatim

e3

“Terminating high-biomass cover crops with a roller-crimper is a promising technique for weed management in vegetable crops that has the potential to reduce or even eliminate the need for herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1772 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Crotalaria juncea · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Sorghum · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Crotalaria juncea · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Sorghum · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

organic · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.