Paper · 2014 · ADVANCE RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT

Effect of weed management on yield, economics and nutrient uptake in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

T.K. SAMANT; M. PRUSTY

18
claims
57
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010 taking seven treatments (T 1 -oxyflourfen 0.25 kg ha -1 , T 2pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha -1 , T 3 -metribuzin 0.50 kg ha -1 , T 4 -straw mulch, T 5 -farmers practice of 2 hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAT and T 6 -unweeded control) in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The minimum weed index(15.11 %) was obtained in application of straw mulch which minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 89.7, 94.6 and 89.3 per cent, respectively over that of weedy check. Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 ). The same treatment also recorded maximum gross return (Rs.131280 ha -1 ) and B:C ratio (2.06) with additional net return of Rs.48120 ha -1 as compared to weedy check maximum weed density m -2 at 60 DAS (192.6) was found in weedy check whereas farmers practices recorded minimum weed population (22.4). Hence, farmers practice was found to be effective in case easy availability of labours whereas application of straw mulch was economically viable for control of weeds in case of labour scarcity with better nutrient uptake and maximum fruit yield and higher net profit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch gave the minimum weed index (15.11 %) in tomato.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
15.11 %e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum weed index(15.11 %) was obtained in application of straw mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–477 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch reduced nitrogen removal by weeds by 89.7 per cent relative to the weedy check in tomato.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
minimizede0
Value
89.7e0
Qualifier
removal by weedse0
Comparator
weedy checke0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of straw mulch which minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 89.7, 94.6 and 89.3 per cent, respectively over that of weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–623 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch reduced phosphorus removal by weeds by 94.6 per cent relative to the weedy check in tomato.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
minimizede0
Value
94.6e0
Qualifier
removal by weedse0
Comparator
weedy checke0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of straw mulch which minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 89.7, 94.6 and 89.3 per cent, respectively over that of weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–623 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch reduced potash removal by weeds by 89.3 per cent relative to the weedy check in tomato.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
potashe0
Direction
minimizede0
Value
89.3e0
Qualifier
removal by weedse0
Comparator
weedy checke0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of straw mulch which minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 89.7, 94.6 and 89.3 per cent, respectively over that of weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–623 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum plant height (52.26 cm) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
52.26 cme0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum number of branches per plant (12.65) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
no. of branches plant -1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
12.65e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum number of leaves per plant (62.35) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
no. of leaves plant -1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
62.35e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum number of fruits per plant (26.3) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
fruits plant -1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
26.3e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum fruit yield (328.2 q/ha) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
328.2 q ha -1e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum weed control efficiency (80.9 %) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
80.9 %e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices significantly reduced weed density (22.4 m -2) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22.4 m -2e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices significantly reduced weed dry weight (27.6 g m -2) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
27.6 g m -2e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum gross return (Rs.131280 ha -1) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
gross returne1
Direction
maximume1
Value
Rs.131280 ha -1e1
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“The same treatment also recorded maximum gross return (Rs.131280 ha -1) and B:C ratio (2.06)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 936–1029 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave the maximum B:C ratio (2.06) in tomato.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.06e1
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“The same treatment also recorded maximum gross return (Rs.131280 ha -1) and B:C ratio (2.06)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 936–1029 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices gave an additional net return (Rs.48120 ha -1) in tomato compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
Farmers practicese0
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
additionale1
Value
Rs.48120 ha -1e1
Comparator
weedy checke1
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practices recorded maximum plant height (52.26 cm), no. of branches plant -1 (12.65), no. of leaves plant -1 (62.35), fruits plant -1 (26.3), fruit yield (328.2 q ha -1 ) and weed control efficiency (80.9 %) with significantly reduced both weed density (22.4 m -2 ) and their dry weight (27.6 g m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“with additional net return of Rs.48120 ha -1 as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1101 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check had the maximum weed density (192.6 m -2) at 60 DAS in tomato.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density m -2 at 60 DASe0
Value
192.6e0
Qualifier
in weedy checke0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum weed density m -2 at 60 DAS (192.6) was found in weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1170 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practices recorded the minimum weed population (22.4) in tomato.

Treatment
farmers practicese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
22.4e0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“whereas farmers practices recorded minimum weed population (22.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1236 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch is economically viable for weed control in tomato when labour is scarce.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
economically viable for control of weedse0
Qualifier
in case of labour scarcitye0
Setting
Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odishae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of straw mulch was economically viable for control of weeds in case of labour scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1431 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field trial was conducted in Instructional farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Angul of Odisha during Kharif season of 2009 and 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑

organic · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

organic · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.