Nutrient: content · Raphanus sativus (radish)

34 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. calcium(2+)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. lead atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. iron atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. nitrapyrinResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  7. zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. IsodrinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  9. aldrinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  10. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  12. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. kinetinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. fertilizationPositive and negative results25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  16. nitrogenPositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  17. nanoparticlePositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. phosphorusPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  19. in vitroPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  21. botanicalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. organicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. otherResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. rainfallResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  32. salinityResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  33. heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  34. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.