- lead atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- cadmium atomResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- copper atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- heavy metalResults agree6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- magneticResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- uvResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.