Yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)

1. zinc atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. boron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. sucrosePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Gibberellic acidResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. calcium atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. AzotobacterResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. cadmium atomResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
8. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. AzospirillumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. kinetinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Calotropis proceraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. elemental sulfurResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. lead atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationResults differ112 papers: 107 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
19. potassiumResults differ10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
20. nitrogenPositive and negative results21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. applicationPositive and negative results17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect
22. densityPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. phosphorusPositive and negative results12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect
24. irrigationPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. lightPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. sowing timePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. co2Positive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. growing mediumPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. magneticPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. in vitroPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. mulchingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
33. botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
35. radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
36. ozonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
37. inoculationResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. organicResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. otherResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. intercroppingResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. limeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. pruningResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
45. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
46. soil waterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
47. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.