- zinc atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- boron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 1156094Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sowing timePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillageResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- densityResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.