Yield · Moringa oleifera (horseradish tree)

1. Zea maysPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Azospirillum brasilenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Azotobacter chroococcumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Bacillus cereusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. uniconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationPositive and negative results18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. physical treatmentPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. pruningResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. densityResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. growing mediumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.